aPlanner is in MVP validation (Oct–Dec 2026). Figures are design targets. Join the 2027 Korea pilot →
OPPORTUNITY ESTIMATOR

Estimate your planning opportunity

Input your metrics and get an opportunity range built from published benchmarks and aPlanner design targets.

Takes about 5 minutes

Estimated opportunity vs. pilot cost

Opportunity figures are design targets for a large fab; prices are the published KRW list.

$20–70M / yr
Estimated opportunity, large fab (target)
KRW 75–150M
Pilot on one line
KRW 120–300M / yr
Starter subscription
8–12 weeks
Pilot duration (target)

Target figures are design targets from simulation on synthetic fab data. aPlanner has no customer deployments yet; first pilot results are expected in 2027.

HOW IT WORKS

Input your metrics, get your projection

The estimator combines your current metrics with published industry benchmarks and aPlanner design targets. There is no aPlanner performance data behind it yet — the first pilot results are expected in 2027. Enter your metrics across three categories and receive an opportunity range, with every assumption shown.

1

Company Profile

Annual revenue
Number of manufacturing sites
Industry vertical
2

Current Performance

Current forecast accuracy
Planning cycle time (days)
On-time delivery rate
3

Inventory & Costs

Average inventory value
Annual expediting costs
Number of planners
Interactive estimator — in preparation
Until it is live, request an estimate from the founder with your metrics
VALUE DRIVERS

Where the opportunity comes from (targets)

aPlanner delivers value across five key areas. Your specific mix depends on your industry, current capabilities, and scale.

Forecast Accuracy Improvement

Design target: 85–90% forecast accuracy versus the 55–65% typical of spreadsheet-based planning (published benchmark). Better forecasts mean less safety stock, fewer stockouts and more confident commitments.

Target +20–30 pts
Improvement
Est. $10–30M
Annual Value

Planning Efficiency

Automated data collection and AI-powered optimization reduce planning cycles from days to hours, freeing your team for strategic work.

Target −80% cycle time
Improvement
Est. $2–5M
Annual Value

Inventory Reduction

Better forecasts and optimized scheduling reduce excess inventory and safety stock while maintaining service levels.

Target −15–25%
Improvement
Est. $5–20M
Annual Value

On-Time Delivery

Constraint-based scheduling and real-time rescheduling capabilities significantly improve on-time delivery performance.

Target +10–15 pts
Improvement
Est. $3–10M
Annual Value

Expediting Reduction

Proactive planning and early warning systems reduce expediting costs including overtime, rush shipping, and supplier premiums.

Target −40–60%
Improvement
Est. $2–5M
Annual Value
INVESTMENT

Published price list (KRW first)

One price list on aplanner.amoza.ai and www.amoza.ai. The opportunity figures above are estimates; the prices are firm ranges.

ComponentRange
Planning Readiness Assessment (2–4 weeks)KRW 50–100M (≈ US$35–70K)
Pilot on one line (8–12 weeks)KRW 75–150M (≈ US$55–110K)
Starter subscription (annual)KRW 120–300M (≈ US$100–250K)
Professional subscription (annual)KRW 400M–1B (≈ US$300–750K)

Replace estimates with your own data

A Planning Readiness Assessment turns benchmark ranges into a value hypothesis for your line, with the pilot scope and success criteria to test it.