aPlanner is in MVP validation (Oct–Dec 2026). Figures are design targets. Join the 2027 Korea pilot →
MODULE 1 · AI DEMAND FORECASTING

Predict demand with confidence intervals

Forecasting tells the fab what the market will want — per bit-density tier, per generation, with the uncertainty made explicit so the schedule can plan for it.

UC-7 — Quarterly demand revision and node-migration scenario (NAND)
DESIGN TARGET
Target: 85–90%
forecast accuracy — vs. 55–65% with Excel-based planning

Target figures are design targets from simulation on synthetic fab data. aPlanner has no customer deployments yet; first pilot results are expected in 2027.

What it is, what it solves, what it brings

What it is

Ensemble machine learning (LSTM, Prophet, XGBoost, Transformer) forecasting demand per bit-density tier / SKU, from 1 day to 24 months, with confidence intervals. The best model per segment is chosen automatically and retrained as data arrives.

What problem it solves

Excel forecasts reach 55–65% accuracy, which turns into over- and under-production worth US$20–50M a year per large fab. AI / data-center orders swing 30%+ within a quarter, and spreadsheets see it weeks too late.

What benefit it brings

Target 85–90% accuracy (+20–30 points); less inventory in the wrong place; demand sensing that catches hyperscaler swings weeks earlier. All figures are design targets until the first Korean pilot reports.

IN THE MVP

Where the forecast meets the plan

The dedicated forecasting view is in development for the December 2026 build. Today the forecast feeds the scheduler and shows up where the planner decides: in the KPI row, the commitment-risk panel and the daily digest. Screens below are from the October 2026 MVP on synthetic data.

Analysis — KPI row: yield Δ, commitment risk, bottleneck shift
Daily Digest — 3 weekend events, 2 folded into a proposed re-plan, 1 needs the planner’s call

Capabilities

Built for the demand patterns of memory and wafer fabs — tiers, generations and hyperscaler swings — not for consumer retail.

Multi-model ensemble forecasting

LSTM, Prophet, XGBoost and Transformer models compete per segment; aPlanner selects and re-weights the best combination automatically.

Bit-density and node awareness

Forecasts per bit-density tier (TLC / QLC, 128Gb → 1Tb) and per generation, rolled up to die and wafer starts — the units a NAND planner actually works in.

External signal integration

Market indices, commodity prices and leading demand signals can be added to the feature set once the fab decides which signals it trusts.

Hierarchical reconciliation

Forecasts reconcile across SKU, product family, customer and region so planning, sales and finance work from one set of numbers.

Confidence intervals

P10–P90 bands on every forecast feed the scheduler and the Monte-Carlo risk wrap, so safety stock and wafer starts are sized to real uncertainty.

Explainable forecasts

Each forecast carries its drivers and a bias flag per region or segment. No black box — the planner can see why a number moved.

Technical specifications

Algorithm typesLSTM, Prophet, XGBoost, Transformer ensemble
Forecast horizons1 day to 24 months
GranularityBit-density tier, SKU, product family, customer, region
Data requirementsMinimum 12 months of history (24 months recommended); synthetic data in the MVP
Update frequencyDaily, weekly or on demand; automatic retraining as data arrives
Accuracy metricsMAPE, bias, tracking signal, forecast value added
StatusForecasting view in development for the December 2026 build; engine prototyped on synthetic fab data

Forecast your fab's demand with us in 2027

The 2027 Korea pilot program starts with a planning readiness assessment on your own demand history.